Data-Backed Expert Search Platform

Expert Witnesses Who Survive Rule 702 in Environmental & Toxic Tort Litigation

On PFAS plumes, Prop 65 safe-harbor math, and other exposures - Connect delivers conflict-cleared modelers, toxicologists, and clinicians whose methods courts accept.

PFAS plumes, Prop 65 safe-harbor math, and other toxic torts - Connect delivers conflict-cleared modelers, toxicologists, and clinicians whose methods courts accept.

Trusted by firms and municipalities for PFAS MDL 2873, benzene litigation, and Prop 65 enforcement

Where Toxic Tort Teams Lose Ground on Experts

Rule 702 demands dose, pathway, and causation backed by reliable methods. When experts contradict each other - or MDL and notice deadlines close in - cases lose leverage fast.

Dose Makes the Case

Without thresholds, experts get excluded

MDL Bottlenecks

Coordinated reports strain even deep benches

Conflict Minefield

Big consultancies are tied up across PFAS, talc, benzene

Citizen-Suit Deadlines

60-day CWA/Prop 65 clocks collapse prep time

Medical Monitoring

Survival depends on state law and expert framing

Since the December 2023 amendments, Rule 702 puts the burden squarely on the proponent—making early expert screening essential.

·

The Expert Bench Toxic Tort Cases Require

Connect can deliver experts as a cohesive stack - modeler to clinician - so assumptions align and contradictions don’t unravel testimony.

Toxic Tort Expert Bench
How Connect Helps
Rapid Shortlists

Modelers, hygienists, toxicologists, or clinicians—with conflicts and availability cleared before you see the names.

Court-Tested Science

Dose calculations, exposure pathways, and causation opinions reviewed for Rule 702 reliability, so they survive exclusion and strengthen settlement leverage

Specialized Support

Expert sourcing tailored for MDL coordination, Prop 65 notices, and citizen-suit deadlines, where compressed schedules demand early credibility

Operational Relief

Review logistics, interview scheduling, and billing handled by Connect, so your team stays focused on strategy

A Workflow Built for Rule 702 and MDL Pressure

Define Role & Timing

Share case posture (pre-suit, MDL, citizen suit). No sensitive docs required.
Conflict + 702 Screen

Review conflicts and optionally stress-test opinions before names are revealed
Interview & Selection

Calendars pre-cleared to interview experts and align selection with MDL schedules
Stack Alignment

Modeler, hygienist, tox, and clinician scoped to work off the same assumptions
Interviews, Onboarding and Billing

Scheduling, invoicing, and expert communications in one place
Not a directory. A sourcing process built for Rule 702 exclusions, citizen-suit clocks, and MDL bellwethers

Learn How to Vet a Modern Expert Search Firm

What to Ask Before Choosing Your Next Expert Witness Provider

Covers red flags, must-have criteria, and key vetting questions to ask if you want to go deeper in structured Antitrust proceedings.

Attorneys say
From the Expert’s Side
Be Ready for the Next
Toxic Tort Expert Bench Test

Whether it’s a citizen-suit notice, Prop 65 filing, or MDL schedule, timelines close fast. Connect helps you secure credible experts before pressure points define the case.

Need an Expert Now?

Send us the issue one-liner. We’ll guide the rest.

Send us the issue one-liner.
We’ll guide the rest.

Toxic tort litigation turns on three risks: exclusion, conflict, and time.
Connect secures experts whose opinions align on exposure, dose, and causation - and whose calendars match the clock you’re on.

Checklist is on the Way to Your Inbox.

Didn't get the email? Check your spam folder—or reach out to info@patexia.com and we’ll send it your way.

Want to experience a modern, data-enabled expert search process and it’s result?

See how Patexia Connect runs expert searches with real case data, a dedicated team, and results that save time and strengthen strategy

 

Let us know how you’d like to use it, and we’ll reach out when a spot opens.